Joined
Last Online
Recent Posts
posted in Vintage News read more

@protoaddict Pushing this even further, since there is a finite amount of cards in existence, wouldn't we go back to finite possibilities?

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

@thewhitedragon69 I'd actually be very interested in data with a % of matches that would have been won by the opponent on their next turn, as I feel there are also a good % of blowout matches.

That should be fairly easy to gather data on, if anyone feels like taking notes on their next playtesting or tournament 🙂

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

@chubbyrain
To be noted, this PW had a -1, so it can exile a graveyard and take a Walla or Bolt and disrupt another turn.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

To be noted, the +1 is until your next turn, so you can transform a random artifact to block and protect this if needed.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

@protoaddict Agreed. I don't think it'd be playable even if it put the 3 lands directly in play and untapped with Nissa.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

I'd start by asking what 3 lands you'd want to put in your hand on turn 4 and later.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

Ohh, completly forgot it doesn't only shuffle itself. In that case just play baby Emrakul for a 13/13, or Blightsteel Colossus, or Worldspine Wurm if you have a sac outlet.

posted in Single-Card Discussion read more

Annihilator 1 (Whenever this creature attacks, defending player sacrifices a permanent.)

Triggers at the declare attackers step, so won't work.

This card would really need haste, and you need a big creature in your hand to work. I'm guessing it could work in Survival. You can always get Emrakul when needed, and discard it when not.