@GutoCmtt what is the mix of decks that you play against online? We can compare those %'age and win rates for those matches against the Champs field %'ages.

@neo_altoid you could play a ham sandwich to top 32, as long as it has overpowered land(s) and some spicy mustard. So I’m not taking your result as worthwhile. But that is a good disclaimer for other people.

@drstreetmention edited the "original" post -- although going through the decklists right now, Paul Callis who played "Junk Survival" to a 6-2 record played the same 60 as the winning Asia Vintage Champs-- so it really was Bant.

Cleaning up the data and moving people to the right category:
Bant Survival = 65% win rate (8 players)
RGwu Survival = 55% win rate (6 players with 1 or more Ancient Grudge and Chewer)
Other Survival = 75% win rate (1 player: FOW Leovold / Misstep)

@drstreetmention I had written the colors backwards and updated my post, I got the info from the spreadsheet posted by Diophan

Eternal Weekend results:
Bant Survival = 64% win rate (7 players)
RGwu Survival = 58% win rate (4 players)
Other Survival = ~63.6% win rate (4 players: Junk, Bug, 2 4c lists)

Cleaning up the data and moving people to the right subcategory:
Bant Survival = 65% win rate (8 players)
RGwu/4c Survival = 55% win rate (6 players with 1 or more Ancient Grudge and Chewer)
Other Survival = 75% win rate (1 player: FOW Leovold / Misstep)

Great analysis. In the last chart, where does Survival fall? Taxing?

What abysmal win rates for Dredge and Oath (and budget). Oath was a mixed bag of win rates by matchup, but Dredge just lost to every other deck except Big Blue.

Part of the current OMA Kickstarter includes the Karn playmat at a certain level of reward.

What if we run main deck Praetors Grasp to grab their Lotus and Timewalk, then do this over and over.

Fun time, really glad to make it and meet the locals.

I’ll have to play more of a brew next time.