I've had a look at untap.in before. It seemed very messy, but maybe it deserves another look. 
My handle is "hardy".
@thewhitedragon69 Cool! That's like 4-6pm here in Norway. Might work once in a while, but it's usually family time before my kid goes to bed. I'll make sure to check if you're online when I have the time to escape everyday life!
Sorry if this is necroing. Is anyone still using cockatrice? Would be sweet to get some games in once in a while. My handle is "hardy".
They are not closing down. https://www.mtgsalvation.com/articles/49778-a-new-and-exciting-beginning
@joshuabrooks I like it. I've toyed with the idea of a Vintagy format only allowing old boarder sets but with a higher power level than middleschool/premodern/hyperextended.
I play a couple of different casual formats that have grown to be become quite popular. The key to succeed in creating a community is to start small and grow it organically. You don't need buy-in. Build it and they will come. Or not.
Do you hate it out with Grafdigger's Cage? Maybe end step Hurkyll's Recall?
Destroy any number of target planeswalkers.
Maybe this goes without saying, but 0 is a number.
@smmenen Good read! Very cool with a tool that can measure diversity. Seeing is believing.
My only critique of your article would be that it wasn't immediately obvious that you flipped the index. You wrote
Recall that a higher value indicates a more balanced and more diverse metagame, and a lower number indicates a less balanced and less diverse metagame, with .99 being a nearly perfectly balanced and diverse metagame with a plethora of viable decks, and a value closer to 0 being a metagame dominated basically by a single deck.
But for that sentence to make sense, you would have to have read the endnote as you make no mention above of why this changed.