I don't think you realize how bad you make yourself look and Chubbyrain did the same thing in the other thread.
1- it disrupts the thread completely. I came here to see speculation about metagame developments or a theoretical explanation/breakdown for this event. Instead I get a sterile conversation with walls of texts where each party is neither clearly wrong or clearly right but are trying to push their opinion on the other, and it rapidly degenerates into personal attack and such things.
2- You guys get really angry with Steve's way or arguing and thus make yourselves look less gentleman-y than before. I mean you guys are respected in the community for your innovation and effort, but when you went down this road you lost some amount of respect (at least in my eyes).
3- Arguing with a lawyer seems like a bad idea/waste of time, especially when Steve is obviously biased about the card Gush and not being entirely honest (although in retrospect his point of view seems more in accordance with what the metagame is going through now). If you really believe someone's arguments to be lazy or fallacious why would you continue (or even start) arguing with them. Personally if someone is being stubborn with "absurd" arguments I would just stop the discussion, what's the point going on ?
I mean why is it easier to get pointless arguments than constructive stuff on this forum. Why do (some) people have to behave like this, snobbish and snapping at other people who they believe wrong instead of using a more constructive and tactful approach?