Navigation

    The Mana Drain

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Strategy
    • Community
    • Tournaments
    • Recent

    SMIP: My Suggested B&R List (2019)

    Vintage News
    so many insane plays
    22
    53
    15986
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      Smmenen TMD Supporter last edited by

      B&R List suggestions for Vintage and Old School. A weekend or Monday long-read:

      https://www.eternalcentral.com/so-many-insane-plays-vintage-and-old-school-banned-and-restricted-list-recommendations-2019/

      SCG archive
      EC
      History of Vintage
      Twitter

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
      • John Cox
        John Cox last edited by

        I really appreciate your commitment to good, consumable material and the community all these years. Thank you for these articles Smmenen.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • H
          Horvath last edited by Horvath

          Good stuff. I think the quality of games would improve further if we restrict Narset and Karn, in addition to the proposed changes. Narset is boring to play against. Karn is boring to play, and play against.

          I remember seeing Sharazad in an old school list and wondering why it's still banned in vintage, when there are so many other cards in the format that require a long time to do their thing. Chaos Orb, using Eternal Central rules, would also be unbanned if it were up to me.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • ajfirecracker
            ajfirecracker last edited by

            There's a lot of discussion of Dredge here. What do you think is the metagame % that merits some sort of targeted B&R action? Is it a different level of play from other decks, like Xerox or Shops?

            "Pitch Dredge is the worst thing to happen to Vintage this decade." - 2015 Vintage Champion Brian Kelly

            youtube.com/user/ajfirecracker/videos
            twitch.tv/ajfirecracker

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • B
              babau last edited by

              Why not flash unrestriction?

              13NoVa 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • S
                Smmenen TMD Supporter @ajfirecracker last edited by

                @ajfirecracker said in SMIP: My Suggested B&R List (2019):

                There's a lot of discussion of Dredge here. What do you think is the metagame % that merits some sort of targeted B&R action? Is it a different level of play from other decks, like Xerox or Shops?

                I would hold all decks to the same, uniform standard, vis-a-vis dominance, as described in this article.

                Dredge's projected percent of Top 8s for August Vintage Challenges is just 12.5%. It's got one appearance per top 8 in the last three weeks.

                SCG archive
                EC
                History of Vintage
                Twitter

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @Smmenen last edited by A Former User

                  @smmenen

                  Your analysis of Mystic Forge Seems catered to those who believe there is a problem with the glass cannon Karn deck.

                  I’m not convinced there is a problem with the deck (since it isn’t good), and so I don’t follow your argument that it should be restricted. Usually you back up your positions with evidence (data), but there just isn’t any to support the restriction of Mystic Forge. You say it’s too easy to cast and then reliably play out your deck, but in my experience playing with and against the deck, typically Mystic Forge nets a card or two and then is destroyed anyway. Of course you could have a broken hand with Defense Grid and cost reducers, but that’s Vintage and that guy playing all that stuff just isn’t winning the tournament. (instead he is complaining on Facebook about Karn mirrors and how Karn should be restricted)

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • vaughnbros
                    vaughnbros last edited by

                    The article is interesting in that it kind of provoked thoughts out how you think the B&R list should be managed. I’m just not sure that I agree.

                    The minimalist approach has a problem in that it’s really only band-aiding much larger wounds and then every set with decent printings, like Karn/Forge or TC/Dig, ends up with a few bad months of Vintage followed by a restriction. This ultimately completely defeats the purpose of having an eternal format. Not only can you not really play your deck from 5+ years ago, you often can’t really even play your deck from like 3 months ago (due to frequent printing/restrictions).

                    I think there is probably a middle ground between your minimalist and mine/Brian’s scorch earth that was elaborated on a couple months ago that would probably be best for the community. That might mean letting go of a couple of “pillars” to give the house some more space.

                    nedleeds S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • 13NoVa
                      13NoVa @babau last edited by

                      @babau Flash Unrestriction would make the format EVEN WORSE than it is now. I don't want to play against turn 1 Bargain into Omniscience every single game via Flash - Rector.

                      Flash is at least 3x as dangerous now as it was back in the Protean Hulk days.

                      Brass Man (to me): "Yeah, you're very specific about the things you're really mean about."

                      twitch.tv/MSolymossy

                      nedleeds 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • B
                        babau last edited by

                        Difference to play against pitch dredge?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • nedleeds
                          nedleeds @13NoVa last edited by

                          @13nova said in SMIP: My Suggested B&R List (2019):

                          @babau Flash Unrestriction would make the format EVEN WORSE than it is now. I don't want to play against turn 1 Bargain into Omniscience every single game via Flash - Rector.

                          Flash is at least 3x as dangerous now as it was back in the Protean Hulk days.

                          Flash with London Mulligan sounds like Roshambo.

                          @TeamTuskMTG on Twitter
                          Sometimes caster on Tusk Talk

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • nedleeds
                            nedleeds @vaughnbros last edited by

                            @vaughnbros said in SMIP: My Suggested B&R List (2019):

                            The article is interesting in that it kind of provoked thoughts out how you think the B&R list should be managed. I’m just not sure that I agree.

                            The minimalist approach has a problem in that it’s really only band-aiding much larger wounds and then every set with decent printings, like Karn/Forge or TC/Dig, ends up with a few bad months of Vintage followed by a restriction. This ultimately completely defeats the purpose of having an eternal format. Not only can you not really play your deck from 5+ years ago, you often can’t really even play your deck from like 3 months ago (due to frequent printing/restrictions).

                            I think there is probably a middle ground between your minimalist and mine/Brian’s scorch earth that was elaborated on a couple months ago that would probably be best for the community. That might mean letting go of a couple of “pillars” to give the house some more space.

                            The minimalist approach was never going to work if Magic just kept on living and producing 3-5 sets a year. It's the nature of a non-rotating format with a singleton list. Eventually Vintage will have infinite restricted cards given infinite new printings.

                            @TeamTuskMTG on Twitter
                            Sometimes caster on Tusk Talk

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • vaughnbros
                              vaughnbros last edited by

                              @nedleeds

                              Yes, that is my point. We’ve now seen the minimalist approach in practice on the Vintage meta for years now too, and the results have been pretty hit or miss. It was ok when we have had long gaps between strong sets. Those gaps are disappearing with a number of cards being printed directly into Eternal, and skipping standard.

                              Restricting every decent artifact that costs 4 or less, and restricting every decent blue draw spell that costs 2 or less is forming a very long, and now starting to be ineffective list.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • S
                                Smmenen TMD Supporter @vaughnbros last edited by Smmenen

                                @vaughnbros said in SMIP: My Suggested B&R List (2019):

                                The article is interesting in that it kind of provoked thoughts out how you think the B&R list should be managed. I’m just not sure that I agree.

                                The minimalist approach has a problem in that it’s really only band-aiding much larger wounds and then every set with decent printings, like Karn/Forge or TC/Dig, ends up with a few bad months of Vintage followed by a restriction. This ultimately completely defeats the purpose of having an eternal format. Not only can you not really play your deck from 5+ years ago, you often can’t really even play your deck from like 3 months ago (due to frequent printing/restrictions).

                                I think there is probably a middle ground between your minimalist and mine/Brian’s scorch earth that was elaborated on a couple months ago that would probably be best for the community. That might mean letting go of a couple of “pillars” to give the house some more space.

                                I don’t consider my approach “minimalist,” and not sure why you do either. Labels aren’t reality.

                                Here is my take on every restriction ever, and what should have happened. Pay close attention to 1999, as it illustrates my approach best by contrast to what happened: https://www.eternalcentral.com/history-of-vintage-schools-of-magic-an-alternative-history-of-the-banned-and-restricted-list/

                                SCG archive
                                EC
                                History of Vintage
                                Twitter

                                vaughnbros 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • vaughnbros
                                  vaughnbros @Smmenen last edited by

                                  @smmenen

                                  Most time points, you were advocating for fewer restrictions than actually occurred and that usually seems to be your stance in debates here. I don’t think it really serves much to argue semantics though. I was simply using the phrases “minimalist” and “scorched earth” to emphasize the wide difference between our point of views.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    Smmenen TMD Supporter last edited by

                                    I don’t recall seeing your preferred restrictions so it’s hard to know exactly how much daylight there is between our views.

                                    SCG archive
                                    EC
                                    History of Vintage
                                    Twitter

                                    vaughnbros 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • vaughnbros
                                      vaughnbros @Smmenen last edited by

                                      @smmenen

                                      I’ve written posts before, but my suggestions would be to hit the “manabases” of every major deck:

                                      Restrict Island-Type Duals (potentially Island Fetch lands as well)
                                      Restrict Ancient Tomb (potentially workshop as well)
                                      Restrict Narcomoeba (potentially powder as well)

                                      A number of cards could potentially be removed from the restricted list at that point if you go with the one in parathenses as well, like Gush and Lodestone.

                                      This achieves both “minimalist” as in a short list and creates diversity by forcing all the top decks to re-imagine themselves to some degree.

                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • S
                                        Smmenen TMD Supporter last edited by

                                        That's crazy town. Those suggestions are so far outside the mainstream paradigm that I'm not sure you can even have a common-basis conversation about B&R policy with most people. I don't even know what your goals or objectives are, and can't even guess.

                                        SCG archive
                                        EC
                                        History of Vintage
                                        Twitter

                                        vaughnbros 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                        • vaughnbros
                                          vaughnbros @Smmenen last edited by

                                          @smmenen

                                          What’s crazy is restricting Mystic Forge and expecting to have any lasting impact. You are band-aiding the real problem in that Vintage manabases are too consistently powerful.

                                          Workshops can consistently drop a 4 CC spell on turn 1/2. Dredge can consistently mulligan to a single card and then hit creatures on its first dredge. Blue can consistently fix a 3 or 4 color manabase with basics. These break fundamental balancing rules that cards are printed with in mind now as none of these mechanics are returning.

                                          What will be printed is another Mystic Forge.

                                          Horologium 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • Horologium
                                            Horologium TMD Supporter @vaughnbros last edited by

                                            @vaughnbros said in SMIP: My Suggested B&R List (2019):

                                            @smmenen

                                            What’s crazy is restricting Mystic Forge and expecting to have any lasting impact. You are band-aiding the real problem in that Vintage manabases are too consistently powerful.

                                            Workshops can consistently drop a 4 CC spell on turn 1/2. Dredge can consistently mulligan to a single card and then hit creatures on its first dredge. Blue can consistently fix a 3 or 4 color manabase with basics. These break fundamental balancing rules that cards are printed with in mind now as none of these mechanics are returning.

                                            What will be printed is another Mystic Forge.

                                            While you’ve provided an explanation, your reasoning is going in so many directions I can’t even follow your logic.

                                            1.) Why would you restrict Narcomoeba? Your primary argument is restricting mana bases.

                                            2.) I am confused by “blue can consistently fix a 3 or 4 color mana base...” If I assume you mean decks that are built primarily using blue cards, I still don’t understand your explanation. Every deck can utilize mana fixing/fetching if needed. If you are specifically mentioning blue because of the powerful blue cards that have been printed, that’s why we have a restricted list. If your original argument is that the restricted list is a band-aid and the mana bases are the real problem, then would it be fine if WOTC printed another Ancestral Recall or Demonic Tutor with restricted dual lands?

                                            3.) That last point bring me to my final area of confusion: to which fundamental balancing rules are you referring?

                                            vaughnbros 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post