Navigation

    The Mana Drain

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Strategy
    • Community
    • Tournaments
    • Recent

    Vintage Challenges - March 2018

    Official Tournament Results
    vintage challenge
    9
    18
    7314
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User last edited by A Former User

      Data from the month of March

      Thank you to multiple people for reaching out and helping with data collection (@MikeTheProf @nucleosynth @KingLeovold)

      Major props to twitch user k0dydraven who has figured out a way to import round results from mtgo, saving us a lot of time.

      0_1523488262228_a37f024e-6fdc-4fe9-9bd9-0941a9c58f18-image.png

      Link to spreadsheet

      Edit: Also props to Ryan @diophan XD

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 11
      • S
        Smmenen TMD Supporter last edited by

        Thank you, and thank you to the people who helped crowd source this!

        SCG archive
        EC
        History of Vintage
        Twitter

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • BazaarOfBaghdad
          BazaarOfBaghdad last edited by

          Little fishies leading the field.

          FORCEOFNATURE 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • FORCEOFNATURE
            FORCEOFNATURE @BazaarOfBaghdad last edited by FORCEOFNATURE

            @bazaarofbaghdad

            Just one player.

            Seems like shops are clearly the dominant deck; most represented and highest win percentage other than a single outlier.

            Pretty clear on nearly every metric.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • N
              neo_altoid last edited by neo_altoid

              Thanks Matt (and the various people crowdsourcing this!).

              Basically, I read this as there 4 decks that make any sense to play:

              Paradoxical
              Dredge
              Xerox
              Shops

              Anything else is hoping and praying Variance comes your way.

              (Just to get an idea--what are the various 4c Dark Confidant Piles classified as? Xerox?)

              Marland_Moore ? 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • Marland_Moore
                Marland_Moore @neo_altoid last edited by

                @neo_altoid Read this as MTGO only has 4 decks to play. Playing paper looks very different.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User @neo_altoid last edited by

                  @neo_altoid Sure, though I think that's a little narrow.

                  Shops isn't very diverse on MTGO (Overseer is by far the most dominant variant to an almost ubiquitous degree). From the 3/31 challenge:
                  0_1523653392621_99149e32-5910-469f-967b-c33cbfba04c5-image.png

                  Paradoxical is...weird? There is some variance with things like Saturn PO with Shops, Thoughtcast PO, PO Storm, and Esper PO but for the most part, the Esper PO has been much more successful.

                  Xerox is also pretty diverse. There are clear token variants that run Young Pyromancer and Mentor, there are Delver variants, there are the Snapcaster Control variants that I've been playing, and there's a 4 color control DRS deck, basically the Fish deck with the Xerox package over Bobs. The restriction of Mentor, Gush, and Probe have weakened the strength of the Token variant and allowed for more diversity within the archetype.

                  Dredge is dredge, with most variation due to flex spots in the main and which SB strategy to employ.

                  I actually think Xerox and Paradoxical are pretty interesting right now, but to each their own.

                  @moorebrother1 We've been over this... The paper metagame is not monolithic and your FNM level local events are not representative of the format.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Marland_Moore
                    Marland_Moore last edited by Marland_Moore

                    Let me start by saying I really appreciate all of the effort that is put into to getting this data.

                    But, I am very tired of being dismissed about my point that Paper events are showing more innovative decks and more diversity. Just checking this site I get found these results:

                    http://themanadrain.com/topic/1862/knight-ware-monthly-unsanctioned-vintage-4-15-2018 (12 players)
                    1st Xerox
                    2nd 2 Card Monte

                    http://themanadrain.com/topic/1861/14-april-2018-romancing-the-stones-3-27-players-in-austin-tx (27 players)
                    1st Paradoxical Mentor
                    2nd White Eldrazi
                    3rd Dark Petition Storm
                    4th Two Card Monte

                    http://themanadrain.com/topic/1802/lcv-2018-march-22-players-barcelona-top16-decklists (22 players)
                    1st Hydra Gush
                    2nd Dredge
                    3rd Dredge
                    4th Wizards

                    I see that the MTGO Challenges are getting 40 - 50 players, which is awesome. I also see a ton of discussion on Vintage Lands and 8 Moon, which you will never see top 8 on MTGO. Is it because the people that play these decks are bad players? The answer is NO. There is a population of players that do not play MTGO but play Magic at a high level. The answer is YES. They may not be as good as the Champs on MTGO but their decks and their innovations are not in the MTGO data.

                    I am about to sell all of my MTGO cards and get off MTGO. I do not like it, but I do see value in having it and looking at the data. I also see value in looking at what people are playing in Paper.

                    ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ?
                      A Former User @Marland_Moore last edited by

                      This post is deleted!
                      Marland_Moore 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User last edited by

                        We know via replays and published results every deck that's played in the Challenges. Lands has seen play several times and NolaGold (notable legacy Lands pilot) streamed it this past weekend to a 2-3 record. 8 Moon saw play right after Champs and I think cracked a top 8, but left the metagame as it was unable to sustain success. 2CM sees play once in a blue moon, but it does see play. Hydra Gush has seen an uptick in play as well recently. I think you are underestimating how competitive the MTGO challenge metagame is and how quickly it adapts, relative to the paper metagame. The lack of top 8's comes from increased competition rather than being completely absent from the metagame.

                        It's also ironic that the 1st place Xerox list is a tweaked version of my MTGO list. If you are using it as an example of innovation, that came from MTGO...

                        Marland_Moore 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • Marland_Moore
                          Marland_Moore @Guest last edited by

                          @hierarchnoble I was specific to discuss the Challenges, not the Leagues. There is a lot of diversity in the League.

                          ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • Stuart
                            Stuart last edited by Stuart

                            I'm a Shops apologist, but those win rates are pretty damning.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • Marland_Moore
                              Marland_Moore @Guest last edited by

                              @chubbyrain I was trying to highlight the 2 Card Monte deck, not Xerox. I have only seen it once on MTGO but several times in Paper.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • Brass Man
                                Brass Man last edited by

                                Please try and find a way to celebrate the interesting decks in your metagame without trashing the decks in someone else's metagame. This goes to both sides of this discussion.

                                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • ?
                                  A Former User @Marland_Moore last edited by

                                  This post is deleted!
                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User @Brass Man last edited by A Former User

                                    @brass-man I'm not trashing anything or anyone. This is a thread about the MTGO challenge metagame for a specific month, not any of the individual paper metagames. I think that is pretty clear and am frustrated that "but paper is different" was brought up. It is in my opinion beyond the scope of this thread (especially since there was already a thread titled "MTGO" that discussed this).

                                    Marland_Moore 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • Marland_Moore
                                      Marland_Moore @Guest last edited by

                                      @chubbyrain That is a fair point. I was only replying because you said that you had addressed this. I won’t bring up on these threads anymore. I’m sorry and I appreciate all of your efforts in analyzing this data. Thank you

                                      Brass Man 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • Brass Man
                                        Brass Man @Marland_Moore last edited by

                                        @moorebrother1 On the other hand, if you want to make a similar thread and highlight interesting decks from your meta (or paper events you follow), that would be pretty awesome πŸ™‚

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • First post
                                          Last post