@oestrus It goes up over time - since it reset at the last downtime, we'll see >100 numbers for a bit, then it will grow as people become stagnant until the league is reset again in June.

The overall time it takes to get an opponent is pretty consistent with what I'm used to.

@hierarchnoble You are indeed correct this gets into personal preference. I work in front of a computer for 10 - 12hrs a day and the last thing I want to do is get back in front of a computer.

I find being around people very necessary part of my enjoyment in playing Magic. I never sold any significant portion of my cards.

Magic has helped me in some of the hardest moments in my life as a very necessary escape. It was also a reason my grades slipped in college and sometimes a distraction at work.

I need to interact with people to feel that this it is worth it for me. I have video games that I can play and I have other hobbies that I can do.

Without the people, then I would just find another hobby that requires interacting with people. I am a runner and that is solo activity, I do not need another solo activity in my life.

That's my perspective on why paper is so important.

last edited by moorebrother1

@hierarchnoble I get it, we are all in different places in life. If MTGO works you that is great. It is just not working great for me.

It should be pretty self evident that some people like MTGO and some people don't. If we can't come up with anything more useful to chat about the subject, this probably doesn't need to be a thread.

For the longest time, I have considered buying into MTGO. Today, this is still something that I am on the fence about. The buy-in cost is irrelevant. My two big inhibitions are time, and potential enjoyment factor. The challenge that I have always had, and continue to have, is overcoming the ever-discussed game client limitations, and losing some of the aspects of the game that appeal the most to me (i.e. the people aspect). Streamers constantly berate MTGO, but, by virtue that they keep playing (and streaming), things are not potentially as bad as they make them out to be.

My question for people is: does the fun outweigh the frustration or vice versa, and why?

@hierarchnoble This was never meant to be the I hate MODO thread. I see value in it, but I wanted honesty about what it is. There are a lot of players out there like me, who have accumulated cards over the years but because of family and work do not have as much time to play.

I thought that playing MODO would provide me with some missing outlet and help give me more insight into playing Magic.

And it has, but I am also trying to honest for people like @rbartlet that playing MODO may give you more access to playing Magic but you lose something too.

I think being honest will help people decide if it is the right place for them to play. I actually played 3 formats when I started out and I had planned on playing Modern.

I invested time and money to figure out how to win, and I was learning the client. But for me, it was just never fun. I have to admit that it was fun when I would just play for practice to try out new decks but the more competitive parts of the MODO just make me mad.

My complaints are not with the client or the clunky play but mostly with the interactions with players or the lack thereof.

The truth is that MODO has made me a better player and it has changed the way I view the game.

last edited by moorebrother1

@rbartlet If you are practicing for tournaments, or want to jam games at all hours, there is nothing better.

I've also had a lot of fun streaming MTGO. Gives it a real social aspect.

Yes MTGO sucks and it's fun to dunk on it. But there's nothing else really comparable to it.

Also I agree with @Brass-Man that this thread is a bit repetitive...

last edited by nucleosynth
  • 75
  • 24526