October 17, 2017 Banned & Restricted announcement



  • @bobbyvictory you know whats AIDS? The actual disease. You know whats not? Anything else. Try using another term to describe your feelings for Mental Misstep's presence in the format.



  • I think it's time to stop feeding the troll. Bobby's made his feelings clear, and as long as he simply repeats himself I suggest ignoring him.



  • @ajfirecracker I promise you that ignoring the misstep problem won't make it go away, nor will it make me go away. I could see more people who don't use this forum coming here and posting about the misstep issue as well.


  • TMD Supporter

    @13nova said in October 17, 2017 Banned & Restricted announcement:

    @bobbyvictory said in October 17, 2017 Banned & Restricted announcement:

    Restricting misstep definitely would bring diversity.

    Bobby, this is not meant to be hostile, but to emhpasize something important.

    ANYONE who thinks restricting Misstep will stop the blue circle jerk is FUCKING DILLUSIONAL. Blue matchups are 50%+ of the metagame, blue mages will replace those missteps with more flusterstorms, spell pierces, etc. Nothing relevant to shops will occur by restricting Misstep.

    While I would not put the matter quite in those terms, Soly is essentially right.

    Bobby, you've been railing for some time against the predominance of "blue" in the format. I think you misunderstand the reason this is, and something fundamental about the nature of the game. The problem is not innovation or creativity or even the power level of blue per se.

    The fundamental problem is the design of the game. In a game that is composed of only 5 colors, with ABU(R) dual lands and Onslaught fetchlands it is too easy to build a resilient and reliable 3 color deck that can find a basic land on turn 1.

    As a result, every single "colored" deck is likely to be at least 3 colors. Given that cards like Ancestral Recall and Time Walk exist, how often is blue going to NOT be at least a secondary or tertiary splash, if not the primary color? Put another way, how often is Blue going to be one of the two worst options for splashing? Very rarely.

    Before Onslaught, there were many more mono-color and two color decks. 3-5 color decks often needed cards like City of Brass for reliability. But once the Onslaught fetchlands were introduced, the entire game changed. Ever since, 3-4 color decks could be built with basic lands found on turn 1.

    So, your railing against "blue" is really misplaced. Blue isn't ubiquitous because people just want to play blue, or are lazy and not creative. Blue is everywhere because Onslaught fetchlands make it easy to play 60-80% of the colors in the game at almost no cost.

    Rationally speaking, the only decks that are unlikely to splash blue are going to be intentionally "colorless" decks, like Workshops/Eldrazi, or decks that are mono-color and don't play fetchlands or splash second or third colors at all. Everything else is just going to have blue for the reasons I just mentioned. If you really want to see more decks that aren't colorless or blue, then you'd have to ban Fetchlands.

    If Magic were a game of 7 or more colors, and if the Onslaught fetchlands had never seen print, you would see much less blue. Before Onslaught, blue was not quite as ubiquitous. I think the institutional memory of pre-Onslaught Magic masks how fundamental that change wrought.



  • @bobbyvictory said in October 17, 2017 Banned & Restricted announcement:

    @ajfirecracker I promise you that ignoring the misstep problem won't make it go away, nor will it make me go away. I could see more people who don't use this forum coming here and posting about the misstep issue as well.

    TMD doesn't need additional chicken littles from the FB Vintage group.



  • @smmenen Fantastic post, Steve. This is incredibly insightful.



  • @seksaybish Now now, no need for name calling :). Just because you don't agree with something or someone doesn't mean you have to resort to lowbrow behavior



  • @smmenen It's islands/bazaars/shops or bust. No one is splashing islands into their deck, they are splashing other colors into a blue deck. The majority of the deck is blue. Counterspells + card draw + blue walkers(usually) + whatever style wincon they want. If it were the other way around, i'd agree with you, but it isn't.
    This IS due to the power level of blue.

    I'm not saying that blue shouldn't be splashed at all, but when every non bazaar/shop deck is blue based with other colors being secondary/tertiary, that has to be a huge tell of blue's power level. Blue is never secondary/tertiary because of the power level.



  • @bobbyvictory said in October 17, 2017 Banned & Restricted announcement:

    I spent money on cards that I don't even want to use anymore because there isn't anything fun these days that I enjoy playing. Tired of the same old bazaar/islands/shops strategies. I resent my decision to purchase these cards. Every vintage website, group and store that supports vintage should have a disclaimer that says:

    Vintage is bazaars/islands/shops only, you've been warned.

    Seriously, because If i had known this ahead of time, I would have never bought in. It doesn't make sense that the format with the largest card pool to choose from has the fewest playable options. It's downright stupid :(.

    I write this without trying to insult you, so please keep that in mind. Your words here and elsewhere create the distinct impression that you don't actually play the format, nor have paid any attention to it for at least the past decade. Vintage revolves around the most broken cards and strategies, and blue decks, Workshop decks, and Bazaar decks have been 3 of out of the top 4 strategies that have consistently risen to the top for over a LONG time (Dark Rituals and dedicated combo being the other, which is in a lull right now). Decks like Fish, Null Rod tempo things, and Colorless Eldrazi simply arise as reactionary forces to this when the metagaming is correct to do so.

    Restricting Workshop isn't going to do anything other than eliminate Workshop decks as a pillar of the format that prevent it from simply charging towards a 85-90+% blue dominated metagame (and yes, I realize not all blue decks are created equal that fit this category, and many have different strategic aims; I'm simply grouping these together for these simple-minded arguments). The critical mass of insane blue spells in Magic's history (many of which are already rightly restricted) are so much higher in power level that it will probably not ever become a format where blue doesn't appear in most of the best decks. It will also likely result in a lot of people quitting Vintage and moving on with their lives (if you do not believe this to be the case, you were not around when the blue apocalypse happened, and Brainstorm/Ponder/Merchant Scroll/Flash all got restricted in one fell swoop, and tons of players quit and set the player-base back massively). If you want Vintage to become a more broken and swingy version of the homogeneity Legacy has moved towards the past 3 years, restricting Workshop is a great over-reactionary idea that will lead to worse outcomes.



  • Steve and Jaco, you guys are putting up some absolutely great posts in this thread. Bobby, Vintage is a lot of fun, but the large card pool is part of why the format isn't nearly as "diverse" as something like Legacy. I, and many others, find a lot to enjoy and love about Vintage. But the format's pillars are what they are because they are so much more powerful than the alternatives.


  • TMD Supporter

    @bobbyvictory said in October 17, 2017 Banned & Restricted announcement:

    @smmenen It's islands/bazaars/shops or bust. No one is splashing islands into their deck, they are splashing other colors into a blue deck. The majority of the deck is blue. Counterspells + card draw + blue walkers(usually) + whatever style wincon they want. If it were the other way around, i'd agree with you, but it isn't.
    This IS due to the power level of blue.

    I'm not saying that blue shouldn't be splashed at all, but when every non bazaar/shop deck is blue based with other colors being secondary/tertiary, that has to be a huge tell of blue's power level. Blue is never secondary/tertiary because of the power level.

    I'll take one more bite of the apple here.

    Your goal is to have more decks that aren't blue. And I'm saying that the only way that's going to happen is if you either 1) increase the % of colorless decks, or 2) ban fetchlands.

    Any "colored" deck is almost certainly going to have blue because the fetchlands make it too easy to include blue, and thereby get access to cards like Ancestral Recall, Time Walk, etc.

    The key distinction isn't between blue and non-blue decks, which you ceaseless harp on. It's between colored and colorless. The Onslaught Fetchlands make it too easy for any "colored" deck to have access to the best cards in the entire format. They might start with a desire to include Ancestral and Time Walk, but it's too easy, and desirable, to build to a critical mass that then allows you to play Force of Will (all you need is about 17 blue spells). Look at something like BUG, with cards like Deathrite Shaman, Abrupt Decay, etc. and you can see how you end up with Forces, Missteps, etc.

    Your crusade to see more non-blue decks ignores fundamental structural features of the format; specifically, the existence of ABU dual lands and Onslaught fetchlands, that render almost any multi colored deck blue.

    Just think it through: What color combinations can you conceive of that aren't improved by including blue? Since it's so easy to build a 3 color deck, there are very few combinations of colors that won't include blue. The only possible non-blue three color decks are: WGR, WBR, WGB, and GRB. That doesn't leave much room for non-blue decks. Most of those decks are going to be improved with a blue splash.

    You are fighting combinatorial math here.



  • @jaco I do not believe restricting the card Mishra's Workshop is the correct move. At one point, I did and I had even comes up with a solution to address the restriction. Rich had brought up the blue apocalypse earlier this week. I was unaware of it. This made me reconsider and think about what else contributes to the explosiveness of the deck. What could possibly be done to the shops archetype to tone down the power level without having a risk that would lead to the "blue Apocalypse" of shops players. The next enabler without a drawback of the shops deck is Foundry Inspector. It's the second card without a drawback in the shops deck that creates the explosiveness that shops has. The card is much better than most think and it plays a large role in the success of the deck nowadays.

    And yes I do play vintage, I have for the last 3 years since i've bought in. Due to the stagnant nature of the format, i've been sitting out of events since the end of April 2017. I qualified for a free spot at NYSE this summer, skipped out. I skipped out of champs. I even thought about playing vintage last months local vintage 1k, prepaid, then skipped out again. This sort of thing should be a sign of the direction where vintage is currently heading. If it is not, we can talk about how attendance is down since 2015 and has never been the same.

    Misstep still needs to get the axe. Blue will still be fun without 4 copies of it and other types of players will also have an opportunity to invest in vintage cards/have fun in the format.



  • @smmenen We could have crop rotation builds if misstep wasn't always there to 2-for-1 the card. We could have dark ritual based black decks and ritual/storm if misstep wasn't always there to stop it. Elves could be a deck again. These are all decks that are not primarily blue based. Sure, we could throw blue in as a third color if someone really wanted to splash for power but those are just a few examples of decks that are really knocked out of vintage due to mental misstep currently. Lockpieces used to play a large role in keeping these decks at bay as well but those have since been reduced to somewhat of a minimum. That's just a few examples. There are players who don't enjoy bazaars/shops/blue based decks that would like to sling moxes and lotus onto the board but choose not to be there isn't a feasible option that they enjoy. Think of all the modern/legacy players that don't play blue/eldrazi that can afford to play vintage but choose not to play it. Vintage is selling itself short by limiting who it appeals to. It's only capturing a fraction of the playerbase and could capture much more if the proper changes were made. Misstep is a direct contributor to this as it does eliminate several options.



  • @bobbyvictory Many of us that have been discussing this with you have played for 20+ years, myself included. The issues you have with the format ARE the format. The point of the format is to play the power 9, which are blue cards and artifacts. That has always been what the decks are in the format, blue based decks, and artifacts. This is what it is, and always will be. I feel you should have researched the format a little before buying into it. I feel legacy or modern is more what you are looking for. Lucky for you, your power has gone up in value since you bought it, and you can sell it to get basically everything you could want in legacy and modern.



  • @mourningpalace I've played magic on an off since the tail end of 94. Played from 94-98ish, 2001-2004, 2008-2011 and the end of 2014-current. It's a shame how you guys are so scared of format change, like godforbid we take away 3 copies of a clearly imbalanced card(misstep). Hell, the card even ruined legacy and had to be banned lol.



  • @bobbyvictory Legacy doesn't have Ancestral Recall so it doesn't frigging matter what Misstep did there. Should we ban Sensei's Divining Top too, since it's banned in Legacy? Just listen to yourself, man.

    And yes, it's obvious that the target to restrict in this version of Shops would be Foundry Inspector. But no, I don't think we're there yet - far from it.



  • @fsecco Why do we need 4 copies of misstep to combat ancestral? You can do it with 1 misstep, flusters, pierces, FOWs, misdirection, negate(yes it has seen play over the last couple years) and up to 8 rebs/pyros lol. Misstep has such a bad effect on the format. Top is not a concern, miracles is nonexistent in vintage. Top can easily be controlled with stony/rod/needle/spyglass/revoker or countermagic.

    In regards for shops, we are absolutely ready for another restriction. The deck has clearly gotten stronger and stronger over time and for shops to make up over 50% of champs top8 is a huge tell that the deck is extremely overpowered at the highest levels of vintage magic.



  • @bobbyvictory said in October 17, 2017 Banned & Restricted announcement:

    @fsecco Why do we need 4 copies of misstep to combat ancestral? You can do it with 1 misstep, flusters, pierces, FOWs, misdirection, negate(yes it has seen play over the last couple years) and up to 8 rebs/pyros lol. Misstep has such a bad effect on the format. Top is not a concern, miracles is nonexistent in vintage. Top can easily be controlled with stony/rod/needle/spyglass/revoker.

    In regards for shops, we are absolutely ready for another restriction. The deck has clearly gotten stronger and stronger over time and for shops to make up over 50% of champs top8 is a huge tell that the deck is extremely overpowered at the highest levels of vintage magic.

    I honestly think a reasonable part of the Vintage player base didn't play before let's say Innistrad and can't image deck building and playing without starting with 7-8 slots burned on Force and Step. That's not a slight, it's a defense in the MTGO 'boomers'. The play pattern and ubiquity of the card is part of them learning the format. Like Force for earlier players.



  • @nedleeds Hum... I've been playing Magic since 94 and Vintage since '01 or '02. I was there when Merchant Scroll had to be restricted because it was Ancestral Recall #2 to 5 (and also Gush #5 to 8). Back in the day the games came to a conclusion of whoever resolves Ancestral first wins. This is not the case anymore and Misstep helps that a lot.



  • @fsecco It won't go back to whoever resolves ancestral first wins though. There aren't the 4 merchant scrolls available that make ancestral #2-#5 due it being restricted. Misstep can still help but there would be 3 less copies.


Locked
 

WAF/WHF