Navigation

    The Mana Drain

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Strategy
    • Community
    • Tournaments
    • Recent

    January and February MTGO P9 Challenge Data

    Official Tournament Results
    6
    10
    6327
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • diophan
      diophan last edited by diophan

      Since Brass Man made it sound like unbreaking the old site will take a while and Kevin asked, here is basic data from the January and Februrary P9 challenges. Matt is working on doing an archetype vs. archetype breakdown. In the meantime I thought I'd post what we have readily available. I think the only reclassifying we did was to move gush storm from gush to combo, but I believe that was only played by one person so the effect should not matter much.

      January Power 9 Challenge:
      Total Number of Players 104
      Top 16 Decklists: http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/mtgo-standings/vintage-premier-2016-01-31

      Shops (ravager, aggro, tiny robots, uba stax, terra nova, martello)
      Number of Players 21
      Win Percentage 49.6%

      Gush (mentor, delver, gush storm)
      Number of Players 15
      Win Percentage 58.2%
      Gush Win Percentage w/o Mirrors: 59.1%

      Big Blue (painter, tezz, BUG control, etc.)
      Number of Players 8
      Win Percentage 53%

      Dredge (traditional, pitch, etc.)
      Number of Players 16
      Win Percentage 52.1%

      Oath (odd, Brian Kelly, Fenton, DP)
      Number of Players 10
      Win Percentage 42.6%

      Combo (DPS)
      Number of Players 16
      Win Percentage 51.1%

      Februrary Power 9 Challenge:
      Total Number of Players 83
      Top 16 Decklists: http://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/mtgo-standings/vintage-premier-2016-02-29

      Shops (ravager, aggro, tiny robots, stax, terra nova)
      Number of Players 19
      Win Percentage 61.2%
      Shops Win Percentage w/o Mirrors: 66.3%

      Gush (mentor, delver)
      Number of Players 17
      Win Percentage 51.4%

      TFK Blue (painter, tezz, 3C control, academy)
      Number of Players 5
      Win Percentage 40%

      Dredge (traditional, pitch)
      Number of Players 12
      Win Percentage 48.4%

      Oath (odd, Brian Kelly, Fenton, Oathstill)
      Number of Players 7
      Win Percentage 37.1%

      Combo (DPS, belcher, rector, doomsday)
      Number of Players 18
      Win Percentage 44%

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • CHA1N5
        CHA1N5 last edited by

        Thank you!

        Host of the So Many Insane Plays podcast.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • nedleeds
          nedleeds last edited by

          Thanks @diophan ! Podcasting tonight and this data is invaluable.

          @TeamTuskMTG on Twitter
          Sometimes caster on Tusk Talk

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • The Atog Lord
            The Atog Lord last edited by

            Shops had a 49.6% win rate? Thank God we got that taken care of.

            "On the other hand, they have admitted that text matters." -- Smmenen

            nedleeds diophan 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • nedleeds
              nedleeds @The Atog Lord last edited by

              @The-Atog-Lord said:

              Shops had a 49.6% win rate? Thank God we got that taken care of.

              Vintage, so coin flippy 🙂

              @TeamTuskMTG on Twitter
              Sometimes caster on Tusk Talk

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • diophan
                diophan @The Atog Lord last edited by

                @The-Atog-Lord That was in January. The only relevant data is February, the month in which modo programmers begin writing their quadruple nested for loops to ensure that the restricted list will be implemented correctly.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                • The Atog Lord
                  The Atog Lord last edited by

                  As though they understand loops...

                  "On the other hand, they have admitted that text matters." -- Smmenen

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                  • ?
                    A Former User last edited by

                    Here is the matchup breakdown for January (Thank you for the help, Ryan. These things are a pain).

                    When drawing conclusions from this, be sure to look at the sample size: (# of matches = # of wins for deck X against Y + # of wins for deck Y against X) (Match win % = # of wins for deck x / # of matches).

                    alt text

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      JosefK last edited by JosefK

                      Well it seems like if combo-summer comes, i'll just start playing "other" 🙂

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • ?
                        A Former User last edited by

                        Here is the matchup vs matchup data for February. Same caveats apply.

                        alt text

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • First post
                          Last post