Well 5 of them.
Worth a quick look.
What were you expecting? People are naturally going to play safer decks in a new unknown meta. This is literally the first competitive anything under the new B&R changes so I wasn't expecting anything mindblowingly new.
99% of people playing Vintage just play net-decks no matter how known the meta is... This is evident by looking at the last 6 months of tournament data. We have complete meta breakdowns for every power 9 challenge. No one tries anything.
@desolutionist I wouldn't try anything in a 70%+ field of mentor and shops.
As of now since B&R update over 4 leagues some of the decks I have played are 3 oath, 1 belcher, what I guess was a vintage adaption of UR delver, some sort of opposition deck and that mono white 8 thalia hatebears deck. I haven't played against any of those in dailies on the last 2 months.
To me people are trying new things or recycling old ideas.
I'm aware of the info stated in that article. Nowhere does it say its automated and not done by a human.
My MTGO monkey statement still is possible.
Some MTGO monkey could easily do a filter search of decks with 10 differences and then they themselves randomly choose them (or not so randomly). It's not as if there are 100's of 5-0s daily forcing automation.