@smmenen said in SMIP Podcast # 78: Dominaria Vintage Set Review:
Yes, in terms of errata, but B&R list policy is another, different matter entirely.
Errata policy already has contained within it a status quo bias - the entire concept of "original ruled functionality" is based on making cards work as they were originally designed and understood to work.
There is no such analog for B&R policy. I don't care if the Vintage metagame deviates entirely from it's roots, as long as the cards work like they always have.
I'm not sure I follow. I mean, sure, you can make a choice that errata policy is different from "Cards That Were Pillars In 1998." But can't you also make the opposite choice? It seems perfectly consistent to say "Cars That Were Pillars in 1998" are immune from restriction just because that's a marker of Vintage as a format. You gotta wear the clothes that were in fashion at that time, so to speak.
I know you could make a different choice and NOT do that, but it seems consistent and readily definable... so a pretty good analog to original ruled functionality.
